Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in “Pay-for-Delay” Patent Settlement Antitrust Case

By on March 27, 2013

by Jeffrey Brennan and Glenn Engelmann

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., will almost certainly have major implications for the viability of Federal Trade Commission and private suits alleging that pay-for-delay settlements are anticompetitive, and for the level of antitrust risk facing companies that enter into such settlements.

Click here to view Jeff Brennan discuss the case on PBS‘ “Nightly Business Report.” 

To read the full article, click here.

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Ranked In Chambers USA 2022
US Leading Firm 2022