Mergers & Acquisitions
Subscribe to Mergers & Acquisitions's Posts

Liberalizations Decree: Main Relevant Changes and Powers of the Italian Competition Authority

by Veronica Pinotti and Martino Sforza

The main developments in antitrust are:

1. Merger Control (Art. 5-bis)

From January 1, 2013:

  • The Italian merger control thresholds will be cumulative and no longer alternative (i.e. the combined turnover in Italy of all undertakings concerned exceeds € 468 million AND the Italian turnover of the target exceeds € 47 million);
  • The current mandatory merger control filing fee (i.e. 1.2 percent of the value of the transaction in a range of € 3,000 and € 60,000) will be replaced by a mandatory fee of 0.08 per thousand of the turnover applicable (regardless of a transaction being filed) to all companies having a turnover exceeding € 50 million (such contribution shall be paid by October 30, 2012 for the first year, and July 31, 2013 for the following years).

2. New Bodies

  • Business Courts (Art. 2) – by September 24, 2012, the IP specialized sections of Italy’s Tribunals and Appeal Courts (renamed “business specialized sections”) will have jurisdiction also over all claims for damages caused by national and EU antitrust infringements, as well as corporate and public procurement matters involving limited companies.
  • Transport Authority (Art. 36) – it will be created within May 31, 2012 and will have supervising powers on the transport sector and the access to relevant infrastructures (it will be fully operative following the adoption of its implementing decrees).

3. Main New Powers of the Authority

  • Unfair clauses (Art. 5) – since March 24, 2012, the Authority is responsible to ensure protection against unfair contractual clauses in business to consumer agreements and it may impose fines up to € 50,000.
  • Unfair commercial practices (Art. 7) – since March 24, 2012, extension of the Authority’s powers in the enforcement of the unfair commercial practices rules to protect, not only consumers, but also small enterprises (with less than 10 employees and a turnover of less than € 2 million).
  • Food sector (Art. 62) – from October 25, 2012, the Authority will have the power to supervise and may apply fines up to € 500,000, in case of breach of the new rules concerning agreements in the food sector (i.e. written form and other specific requirements; obligation to pay within 30 days for perishable goods and within 60 days for all other goods).
  • Public Utilities (Art. 25) – since March 24, 2012, the Authority shall now be consulted in various fields, including the public utilities local award procedures (where the population is above 10,000 inhabitants).

4. Banks and Insurance

  • Banks (Art. 28) – from July 1,2012, banks shall propose to their customers the offers of at least two different insurance groups, if they require a life insurance as a condition to issue a mortgage.
  • Insurance (Art. 34) – no later than July 24, 2012, car insurance intermediaries will be required to inform their customers about the contractual conditions proposed by at least three different insurance groups.

5. Class Action (Art. 6)

Amendments to the current rules (entered [...]

Continue Reading




read more

China Law Alert: Focus on Competition – March 2012

by Henry L.T. Chen, Frank Schoneveld, Alex An, Brian Fu and Angel Wang

McDermott Will & Emery has released the latest China Law Alert: Focus on Competition, which provides insight on current issues surrounding cross-border antitrust and transactional issues. 

China’s New Merger Control Regime Makes Major Progress in Its First Three Years

It is now just more than three years since China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) was introduced. Compared with the well-established practices of US antitrust and EU competition authorities, AML enforcement is still in its infancy. However, China’s AML regulators, especially the authority in charge of merger control, the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), has moved quickly to make its mark on international business. Now, most large, cross-border mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures must also successfully pass the rigors of review by MOFCOM as well as the European Commission and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and/or Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  Read the full article here.

NDRC and SAIC’s Actions in 2011 and Prospects in 2012

China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) are the two authorities in charge of investigation and supervision of “monopoly” agreements and abuses of dominant market position. NDRC focuses on price-related cases while SAIC takes care of non-price related violations of the law. Compared to MOFCOM, which is responsible for merger control, NDRC and SAIC have been relatively quite since China’s AML came into force on 1 August 2008.  Read the full article here.

Civil Litigation under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law

Since the introduction of the China AML in August 2008, Chinese courts have experimented with various methods of civil dispute adjudication based on breach of the AML. In general, China’s courts have very limited judicial experience with such cases. A number of civil cases have been brought before the courts, but very few, if any, have resulted in a successful judgment for breach of the AML.  Read the full article here.

Might the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) Become A New Enforcement Authority for China’s Competition Laws?

In addition to MOFCOM, SAIC and NDRC, the three major enforcement authorities for the anti-unfair competition and anti-monopoly laws, it seems the MIIT might also become a regulator of competition in the telecommunications sector. In addition to a Draft Regulation on Internet Information Services, published for consultation in January 2012, MIIT released an “Opinion on Regulating the Business Activities of Basic Telecommunications Carriers on Campuses” (the Opinion) on 30 June 2011.  Read the full article here.




read more

Acting Assistant Attorney General Sees Increasing Barriers to Entry in Health Insurance

by Hillary Webber

Last week, Sharis Pozen, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, spoke at the World Annual Leadership Summit on Mergers and Acquisitions in Health Care, where she affirmed that protection of competition in the health care industry is a top priority of the Division.  Pozen highlighted the Division’s recent enforcement activities in insurance and provider markets, including challenges to insurance company mergers and contracting practices used by dominant insurers or providers such as Most Favored Nation (MFN) provisions and exclusivity agreements. 

Of note, Pozen remarked that the Division undertook a comprehensive evaluation of health insurance markets, the results of which have caused the Division to regard with increasing skepticism the ability of new entry to constrain a merged health insurance firm.  Pozen explained that new entrants face obstacles because they need provider discounts to attract enrollees but have difficulty obtaining them without a large number of enrollees.  Pozen stated that the Division will focus more attention on entry analysis to protect markets from harmful consolidation, especially markets dominated by one or two plans.  Regarding provider markets, Pozen described the Division as "on the lookout for agreements or arrangements purported to improve quality but where the real goal is simply to raise prices."  This is especially relevant given the Affordable Care Act’s encouragement of provider collaboration in the form of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).

Pozen’s remarks are available at: https://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/281236.pdf.

Pozen’s comments highlight the need for health care companies considering collaborative arrangements with competitors or contracting arrangements such as MFNs or exclusivity agreements to consult counsel and articulate a clear pro-competitive basis for such conduct. 




read more

China Conditionally Clears Western Digital’s Acquisition of Hitachi’s Hard Disk Drive Business

by Henry L.T. Chen, Frank Schoneveld and James Jiang

Recently China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) approved Western Digital’s proposed acquisition of Hitachi’s hard disk drive business on a conditional basis.  Containing the most comprehensive clearance conditions ever imposed by MOFCOM, this decision mirrors previous guidance issued by the European Commission and illustrates that at least two authorities in two of the world’s major economies are working toward imposing similar clearance conditions in their respective jurisdictions.

Read more here.




read more

FERC Reaffirms Merger Policy; Does Not Adopt DOJ/FTC 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines

by Jon Dubrow and Cerissa Cafasso

Public utilities could face different levels of scrutiny in merger reviews before the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (the Antitrust Agencies).

To view the full article, please click here




read more

China’s MOFCOM to Review Merger in Gas Market

by Henry L.T. Chen, Frank Schoneveld and Alex An

Recently, ENN Energy Holdings Limited and China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation jointly announced the acquisition of all outstanding shares in China Gas Holdings Limited.  This acquisition triggers a requirement to notify and obtain clearance from China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM).  Therefore, MOFCOM’s approval will be one of the preconditions for ENN Energy and Sinopec to close the transaction.

To read the full article, please click here




read more

Notification Threshold Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Increased to $68.2 million

by Jon B. Dubrow, Joseph F. Winterscheid and Carla A. R. Hine

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced revised thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR) and 2012 thresholds for determining whether parties trigger the prohibition against interlocking directors under Section 8 of the Clayton Act.

Notification Threshold Adjustments

Pursuant to the amendments passed by the U.S. Congress in 2000, the FTC published revised thresholds for HSR pre-merger notifications in the Federal Register on January 27, 2012.  These revised thresholds will become effective on February 27, 2012.  Any transaction completed and any HSR pre-merger notifications filed on or after February 27, 2012, must comply with these new thresholds.

As required, the FTC adjusted the notification thresholds based on the change in the gross national product (GNP) for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011.   Most notably, the base filing threshold of $50 million, which frequently determines whether a transaction requires filing of an HSR notification, will increase from $66.0 million to $68.2 million.  The changes also will affect other dollar-amount thresholds:

  • The alternative statutory size-of-transaction test, which captures all transactions valued above $200 million regardless of the “size-of-persons,” will be adjusted to $272.8 million.
  • The statutory size-of-person thresholds (applicable to transactions valued at less than $272.8 million, but more than $68.2 million) will increase from $13.2 million to $13.6 million and from $126.9 million to $131.9 million.

The adjustments will affect parties contemplating HSR notifications in various ways.   Parties may be relieved from the obligation to file a notification for transactions closed on or after February 27, 2012, that result in holdings below the adjusted base threshold.  For example, a transaction resulting in the acquiring person holding voting securities or assets valued at less than $68.2 million would not be reportable on or after the effective date.  The adjustments will also affect various exemptions under the HSR rules.  For example, acquisitions of foreign assets and voting securities of foreign issuers will now be exempt unless they generated U.S. sales in excess of $68.2 million or, in the case of foreign voting securities, the issuer has assets in the United States valued in excess of $68.2 million.

Parties may also realize a benefit of lower notification filing fees for transactions that just cross current thresholds.   Under the rules, the acquiring person must pay a filing fee, although the parties may allocate that fee amongst themselves.  Filing fees for HSR-reportable transactions will remain unchanged for now (although the FTC is pursuing filing fee increases).  However, the applicable filing fee tiers will shift upward as a result of the GNP-indexing adjustments:

  • Transactions valued at or in excess of $68.2 million, but less than $136.4 million require a $45,000 filing fee.
  • Transactions valued at or in excess of $136.4 million, but less than $682.1 million require a $125,000 filing fee.
  • Transactions valued at or above $682.1 million require a $280,000 filing fee.

Interlocking Directorate Thresholds Adjustment

On January 27, 2012, the FTC published [...]

Continue Reading




read more

Revised HSR Thresholds for 2012

by Carla A. R. Hine

Today, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revised, higher Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) pre-merger notification filing thresholds.  The FTC adjusts the HSR thresholds annually to represent the increase or decrease in gross national product (GNP).  These revised thresholds will become effective 30 days from the date on which notice is published in the Federal Register, which should occur within the next week.  As such, we expect that these new thresholds will become effective near the end of February.  

Most notably, the size-of-transaction threshold, which frequently determines whether a transaction requires an HSR notification, will increase from $66.0 million to $68.2 million.  Other thresholds will increase as well, including thresholds for the size-of-person test, filing fees and certain exemptions.  The revised thresholds are as follows:

Original Threshold 2012 Adjusted Threshold $10 million $13.6 million $50 million $68.2 million $100 million $136.4 million $110 million $150.1 million $200 million $272.8 million $500 million $682.1 million

Generally, a transaction requires an HSR notification if it meets the applicable size-of-transaction and/or the size-of-person tests, described briefly below, and does not fall within any exemptions.

A transaction meets the size-of-transaction test if as a result of the transaction the acquiring party holds assets, voting securities or a controlling interest in a non-corporate entity valued in excess of

  • $50 million, as adjusted ($68.2 million upon the effective date of these revised thresholds), assuming the size-of-person test is met, or
  • $200 million, as adjusted ($272.8 million upon the effective date of these revised thresholds) — this threshold applies to transactions even if the size-of-person test below is not met.

For the size-of-person test, upon the effective date of these revised thresholds, a transaction resulting in the acquiring party holding assets, voting securities or a controlling interest in a non-corporate entity valued at $68.2 million or more, but less than $272.8 million is generally reportable if one party has assets or sales of at least $10 million, as adjusted ($13.6 million upon the effective date of these revised thresholds), and the other party has assets or sales of at least $100 million, as adjusted ($136.4 million upon the effective date of these revised thresholds).

Although the filing fees for HSR notifications will not change at this time (although this is something currently under review), the thresholds (based upon the size-of-transaction) that determine the correct filing fee will also adjust:

Filing Fee Size-of-Transaction $45,000 $68.2 million, but less than $136.4 million $125,000 $136.4 million, but less than $682.1 million $280,000 $682.1 million or more

Again, these revised thresholds will become effective 30 days after publication of notice in the Federal Register.




read more

Italian Competition Authority Updates Merger Control Turnover Thresholds

by Martino Sforza

The Italian Competition Authority has updated its merger control turnover thresholds.  Effective as of today, November 21, 2011, Section 16(1) of Law no. 287 of October 10, 1990, requires prior notification of all mergers and acquisitions where either of the following conditions is fulfilled:

  • Aggregate turnover in Italy of all undertakings involved is above EUR 468 million
  • Aggregate turnover in Italy of the target company is above EUR 47 million

No notification is required if the target is a foreign company which did not generate any turnover in Italy in the last three years and is not expected to do so as a result of the transaction.

Italy’s merger control thresholds are adjusted annually to take into account increases in the GDP deflator index.  The updated thresholds are published in the Competition Authority’s Bulletin once this increase in index is announced officially.




read more

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Ranked In Chambers USA 2022
US Leading Firm 2022