Nicole Castle Nicole Castle

Subscribe to Nicole Castle's Posts
Nicole L. Castle provides legal counsel on complex civil and criminal antitrust litigation. She regularly represents clients in complex, multidistrict class action antitrust litigation alleging Sherman Act violations. She also defends mergers and acquisitions before the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Nicole counsels clients on strategies for addressing cartel prosecutions and defenses, from the inception of government investigations to the initiation of civil class action litigation. Read Nicole L. Castle's full bio.

Third Circuit: “Rigorous Analysis” Required for Class Certification in Antitrust Cases


By , and on May 21, 2020
Posted In Private Litigation

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently concluded in In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation that a district court’s reliance on average prices to determine class-wide impact was insufficient. Instead, courts must conduct a rigorous analysis of the facts, evidence and expert testimony at the class certification stage of litigation. Access Full Article

Continue Reading



Close Scrutiny for Class Settlements Where Plaintiff Attorneys Take Lion’s Share


By , , , and on Jan 27, 2020
Posted In Cartel Enforcement, Private Litigation

Two recent US antitrust class action settlements drew additional scrutiny from federal judges, showing that the allocation of settlement funds between a proposed class and their attorneys will be carefully reviewed for fairness to class members.

Continue Reading



Obtaining Class Certification in the United States


By , and on Oct 31, 2019
Posted In Private Litigation

Developments in antitrust class actions over the past year highlight the critical role that the certification decision plays. In the United States, the denial of class certification “may sound the ‘death knell’ of the litigation on the part of plaintiffs.” To obtain class certification, plaintiffs must satisfy the four requirements in Rule 23(a) of the...

Continue Reading



The Latest: New DOJ Antitrust Division Policy Makes Compliance Programs More Critical than Ever


By and on Jul 16, 2019
Posted In Cartel Enforcement, DOJ Developments

What Happened: Last week, the Antitrust Division reported that it has changed its Justice Manual to state that it will consider antitrust compliance at the charging stage in criminal antitrust investigations, instead of waiting for plea negotiation or the sentencing stage. Previously, the Antitrust Division had granted leniency only to the first whistleblower to come...

Continue Reading



THE LATEST: DOJ Distinguishes ‘No-Poach’ Agreements


By and on Mar 14, 2019
Posted In DOJ Developments, Private Litigation

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in three related cases in the Eastern District of Washington yesterday dealing with alleged “no-poach” (or non-solicitation) agreements between franchisors like Carl’s Jr, Auntie Anne’s and Arby’s and their franchisees. In the statement, the DOJ distinguished between “naked” no-poach agreements between competitors and the...

Continue Reading



New York Proposes Revised Regulations for Health Care Collaborations


By on Aug 27, 2014
Posted In Healthcare Antitrust

Today, New York health regulators proposed revised rules that would allow health care providers to merge or cooperate with one another without being subject to federal or state antitrust scrutiny. The state’s Department of Health proposed regulations establishing a process for entities to obtain a Certificate of Public Advantage (COPA) pursuant to Public Health Law...

Continue Reading



Detroit Nurses Object to Sixth Circuit Reviewing Class Certification Decision


By on Oct 15, 2013
Posted In Cartel Enforcement, Healthcare Antitrust, Private Litigation

On October 11, 2013, the plaintiffs in the Detroit nurses litigation who have accused Detroit-area hospitals of conspiring to suppress their wages opposed VHS of Michigan, D/B/A Detroit Medical Center’s (DMC) petition to the Sixth Circuit for leave to appeal the district court’s decision granting class certification. DMC had asked the Sixth Circuit to do...

Continue Reading



Takata Corp. Agrees to Pay $71.3 Million Fine for Its Role in Alleged Price-Fixing and Bid-Rigging in the Automotive Parts Industry


By on Oct 14, 2013
Posted In Cartel Enforcement, DOJ Developments

On October 10, 2013, Takata Corp. (Takata), a Japanese auto parts maker, agreed to pay a $71.3 million as part of a plea agreement for its role in an alleged conspiracy to fix prices on seat belts sold to car manufacturers.   In addition, Takata agreed that the Chairman-CEO, Shigehisa Takada, will take a 30 percent...

Continue Reading



STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES